Modeling and Analysis of Clandestine Networks

AF Institute of Technology
AF Institute of Technology

At the conclusion of the Cold War, military planners in the U.S. made the assumption that a military organized, trained, and equipped to fight a near-peer competitor would be able to handle any type of conflict, which would, after all, be considered a subset to a Major Theater War (Barnett, Mar 2004). The pattern that has emerged since the end of the Cold War, however, is not one of conflict with powerful industrialized nations; rather the U.S. has been engaged in locations that were considered to be no immediate threat to national survival, the Third World. It is the Third World that has spawned the “gravest threat we face”, the threat from trans-national terrorism (Barnett, Mar 2004). U.S. military operations since the end of the Cold War also suggest, 1-1 by their mixed results, that the U.S. military is not fully prepared to handle the threats from trans-national, clandestine terror organizations. This fact was most emphatically highlighted on Sept. 11, 2001 (Barnett, Mar 2004).

Modeling and Analysis of Clandestine Networks

Understanding the Form, Function, and Logic of Clandestine Networks

Counternetwork

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s